[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang
From: |
Andrew Pinski |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:02:28 -0700 |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Pete French <address@hidden> wrote:
> All the rest of the email, however, I agree with - the lack of
> ObjC maintenance on GCC worries me greatly. I depend on this
> stuff for my living, and for my business to make sales. Having
> somewhere else to jump to would make me give a huge sigh of relief.
Well if your business depends on it, you might want to hire someone
someone to do the development.
Apple has moved away from GCC so you can no longer depend on them.
Maybe it is just me and your business model is incorrect to depend on
free things when in reality there is no such thing as a free lunch.
-- Pinski
- GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/30
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Ayers, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Ayers, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang,
Andrew Pinski <=
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31