[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang
From: |
Andrew Pinski |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:55:15 -0700 |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Pete French <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Well if your business depends on it, you might want to hire someone
>> someone to do the development.
>
> Well, that would be me. But I kind of have a lot of other stuff to
> do. I'll reprhrase it as "I dont want to take this on myself".
>
>> Apple has moved away from GCC so you can no longer depend on them.
>
> This I did not know. Interesting. I assumed Xcode was still using
> gcc.
I should have said moving away but really they are so close to have
moved away, it can be considered moved.
-- Pinski
- GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/30
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Ayers, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Ayers, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang,
Andrew Pinski <=
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Andrew Pinski, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, David Chisnall, 2009/03/31
- Re: GNUstep base almost builds with clang, Pete French, 2009/03/31