[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging
From: |
Maxthon Chan |
Subject: |
Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:46:36 +0800 |
I do have the binary, but I have legal worries about this, unless it is a kind
of fair use and you can prove it.
The binary is an ARMv7 + ARMv7s Universal Mach-O binary. It is shipped with my
Xcode 4.6 iOS 6.1 SDK. And you can check out the iOS 5.0.1 firmware image for
iPhone 4S which Apple left without practical encryption in place. However in
the iOS firmware all binaries are crammed into an dyld (Mach-O dynamic linker
for OS X and iOS) binary cache file so it is a bit difficult to tackle that
file.
在 2013-3-15,下午4:13,Luboš Doležel <address@hidden> 写道:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:15:56 +0800, Maxthon Chan wrote:
>> I think I scored one on suggesting implementing CF in ObjC here. :)
>
> Well, I have my doubts about this claim. Especially because of
>
>>> "If you look at the Darwin sources, you'll see that the iPhone's
>>> CoreFoundation classes are actually implemented in ObjC."
>
> No iOS CF sources have been made public, so you can't just "look at Darwin
> sources".
>
> And it doesn't really make much sense to me. Why?
>
> 1) Why bother developing, testing and maintaining a separate CF
> implementation when you can use the one you already have?
> 2) There is nothing stopping them using ObjC-based CF even on OS X. Carbon
> apps don't need to know/care if there is any ObjC behind the scenes. Just
> because your app is plain C doesn't meen that the libraries cannot internally
> use ObjC.
>
>> There are very few iOS code available out there, so it is very
>> difficult to hack into that.
>>
>> By the way, I do have an paid Apple iOS Developer account so maybe I
>> can verify something for you? Maybe check iPhone's CF framework's
>> symbol import?
>>
>
> If you can get me an ARM CoreFoundation binary, I can look into its code to
> see what it's doing. I wouldn't fully trust the imports alone.
>
> --
> Luboš Doležel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, (continued)
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Stefan Bidi, 2013/03/14
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Fred Kiefer, 2013/03/14
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2013/03/14
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, David Chisnall, 2013/03/14
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Maxthon Chan, 2013/03/15
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Maxthon Chan, 2013/03/15
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Luboš Doležel, 2013/03/15
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging,
Maxthon Chan <=
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Luboš Doležel, 2013/03/15
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Chan Maxthon, 2013/03/15
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Luboš Doležel, 2013/03/17
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Luboš Doležel, 2013/03/26
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Maxthon Chan, 2013/03/26
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Luboš Doležel, 2013/03/27
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, David Chisnall, 2013/03/27
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Ibadinov Marat, 2013/03/27
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Maxthon Chan, 2013/03/26
- Re: CoreBase toll-free bridging, Luboš Doležel, 2013/03/27