[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Documentation on W32

From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Subject: Re: Documentation on W32
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:01:26 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120805 Icedove/10.0.6

On 09/13/2012 08:39 AM, LRN wrote:

> On 13.09.2012 1:21, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> On 09/11/2012 09:11 PM, LRN wrote:
>>> Right now building gnutls with documentation on W32 is
>>> practically impossible: * documentation requires files generated
>>> by autogen, * non-ancient versions of autogen require guile to
>>> work, * guile doesn't work on W32 * ancient versions of autogen
>>> might now work for gnutls, and are very difficult to build with
>>> modern autotools. Is autogen really necessary? Can these files be
>>> pre-generated and shipped in the tarball?
>> The autogen files are pre-generated and shipped in the tarball.
>> Maybe make considers them old and tries to rebuild them. Which
>> files have this issue in your system?
> OK, here's what i do:
> 1) I unpack gnutls-3.0.23.tar.xz
> 2) I patch it (patches are attached; don't take patch 0004 seriously,

> it's a workaround for braindead w32api library)

I'm wondering what is Loaded_CertEnumCRLsInStore() that you use instead
of CertEnumCRLsInStore()? If the mingw32 issue is widespread I could
include that patch in gnutls.

I've included the rest of the patches, thanks!


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]