[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd
From: |
Ramon Pons Vivanco |
Subject: |
Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:52:32 +0100 |
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 22:25:48 +0100, Mirko Caserta wrote:
Hi boys !
> Also, as I wrote in our web page, I'd suggest using UDP for "inter-nodes
> communication" it's going to be faster as well as easier with commoncpp.
yes, we would use the socket type SOCK_DGRAM :)
The question is ... only UDP or UDP + TCP
> Of course we could use the same port number for TCP/UDP sockets if we
> choose to implement the thing this way.
--
.''`. Why is a cow? Mu. (Ommmmmmmmmm)
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (Kernel 2.4.20) on Ext3
`- http://laurel.datsi.fi.upm.es/~rpons/
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
- [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, Matthias Rechenburg, 2003/03/01
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd,
Ramon Pons Vivanco <=
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, Mirko Caserta, 2003/03/03
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, Matthias Rechenburg, 2003/03/04
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, johnycsh, 2003/03/04
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, Matthias Rechenburg, 2003/03/04
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, johnycsh, 2003/03/05
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, Matthias Rechenburg, 2003/03/05
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, johnycsh, 2003/03/05
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, Ramon Pons Vivanco, 2003/03/05
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, Matthias Rechenburg, 2003/03/06
- Re: [gomd-devel] about the gomd+libgomd, Ramon Pons Vivanco, 2003/03/06