[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118 |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:17:47 -0800 |
Yo Greg!
On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 20:00:09 -0500
Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com> wrote:
> Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com> writes:
>
> >>> Looks like hardware.html is not installed (which is ok, probably,
> >>> and not about this) -- pkgsrc is not expecting it in the
> >>> filesystem.
> >>
> >> It is installed in gpsd-3.22.1~dev/www, as expected. That is where
> >> the GitLab web pages expect it. So as intended and as expected.
> >
> > "installed", as in put in the destdir by "scons install"? Or just
> > existing in the build directory? It is not part ofthe pkgsrc
> > pakcage because it has not showed up in the destdir after the
> > install step.
>
> Looking at Sconscript, it is built in the build directory, but not
> installed -- as in not copied to ${destdir}${prefix}/share/doc or some
> such.
Yup. Who wants html in share/doc? To do what you infer then hardware.html
would have to be turned into asciico to make a doc file.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpcQMIrCWpIp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, (continued)
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/02
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/02
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/02
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/02
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/03
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/03
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/06
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/06
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/06
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Hal Murray, 2021/02/02
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/01