[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118 |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Feb 2021 09:52:57 -0800 |
Yo Greg!
So, no action items left here?
On Sat, 06 Feb 2021 08:30:41 -0500
Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com> wrote:
> "Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com> writes:
>
> >> >> Looks like hardware.html is not installed (which is ok,
> >> >> probably, and not about this) -- pkgsrc is not expecting it in
> >> >> the filesystem.
> >> >
> >> > It is installed in gpsd-3.22.1~dev/www, as expected. That is
> >> > where the GitLab web pages expect it. So as intended and as
> >> > expected.
> >>
> >> "installed", as in put in the destdir by "scons install"? Or just
> >> existing in the build directory? It is not part ofthe pkgsrc
> >> pakcage because it has not showed up in the destdir after the
> >> install step.
> >
> > hardware.html is "installed" as in put into the build directory:
> > gpsd-3.22.1~dev/www. That is the final destination for the web
> > files. The only consumer of them is GitLab.
> >
> > It should not go in any package, or go to the destdir. Users have
> > no use for the www files. Only GitLab uses them.
>
> That's fine. But that's not "installed", which is the step run by
> "make install" or equivalent that takes built things from the buidl
> dir and puts them in destdir.
>
> > I guess some of the www files could go in /usr/share/gpsd. But who
> > expects html there? And what good would it be?
>
> If you want people to be able to read them offline, then they can be
> in $prefix/share/doc/gpsd/html or $prefix/share/doc/gpsd. But I
> don't really care if they are installed or not - I was just trying to
> make sure the pkgsrc package wasn't leaving them out when you thought
> they were being put in destdir.
>
> > One could make the argument that the web pages should be a separate
> > git repository. NTPsec keeps www in a separate git repo. But so
> > much of gpsd www is html colpies of the man apges that the separate
> > repo seems excessive to me.
>
> I agree that the (churn+work)/benefit ratio is too low.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgp1wR3IzRfKT.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, (continued)
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/02
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/03
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/03
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/05
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/06
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Greg Troxel, 2021/02/06
- Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Hal Murray, 2021/02/02
Re: ✘asciidoc vs asciidoctor, issue #118, Gary E. Miller, 2021/02/01