gpsd-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: NTP with only GPS/PPS flags PPS as falseticker


From: Nick Burkitt
Subject: Re[2]: NTP with only GPS/PPS flags PPS as falseticker
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:27:57 +0000
User-agent: eM_Client/7.2.37929.0

Hi Gary.

Maybe I'm having problems with terminology again. The ntpmon output I sent showed a value of 0 in the "reach" column for every row except SHM(0) and SHM(2). If that's not "no reach," then could you explain what you mean by the term?
Thanks,

-Nick

------ Original Message ------
From: "Gary E. Miller" <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: 3/16/2020 4:19:09 PM
Subject: Re: NTP with only GPS/PPS flags PPS as falseticker

Yo Nick!

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 22:38:09 +0000
"Nick Burkitt" <address@hidden> wrote:

 I need to tweak my ntpd.conf so that ntpd will use GPS and PPS when
 no network is available. As it is now, GPS is never used, and when
 all other clock sources go away, PPS is marked with the fatal 'x' as
 well.

Your ntpmon shows you did not wait long.  Your other sources still had
"reach".  Ntpd operates very, very slowly.  Let us know what you see
when everything but the SHM()s have no reach.

Simple lack of patience is the largest problem new users have.

 Here's my current ntp.conf

ntpd has a setting called "minsane".  It is the minimum sane tickers
before it will steer the local clock.  The default is 1, and you
did not over ride it.  So as long as ntpd sees a good SHM(2) then
you should be good.  After givng tnpd time to settle.

   99.104.170.138  132.163.97.6     2 u 1160  128    0 86.471ms
                                               ^^^

Note the reach!

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
address@hidden  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

            Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]