Re: Gpsd clear fix and merge fix

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo raaj!

On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:13:48 +0800
raaj lokanathan <address@hidden> wrote:

> But why I have to do the same checking in my application layer too?

Because that is the way it is.

> Isn't the gpsd supposed to already handle the NaN and store the track
> information.

Yes, but it has to store NAN what it has NO track information.

> Then when my libgps request it I can directly get the
> values from the gps data structure without having a second check in
> my application layer.

Yes, and those empty values will be NAN.

> Please correct me if I am wrong about this.

I keep trying.  But his is the LAST try.  It is what it is, deal with
it.

> If that's the case every
> application has to do the NaN checking?

Every application in C or C++.

> This is how my application is outputting the track information now

Without your code, your output is useless.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
        address@hidden  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

            Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin

pgp8tOQopQAwz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature