[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation
From: |
Gunnar Ritter |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:15:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.2pre 12/25/06 |
"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Gunnar Ritter <address@hidden>:
> > I have often used .in (and seen it used) in a context like
> > <informalexample>. Looking at a few pages, it seems that
> > others have used .ti similarly.
>
> Can you send me an example?
This is from mush(1), July 17, 1996:
An example:
.sp
.ti +2
goto msg: `pick \-f argv`
.sp
This causes the current message . . .
Others are in nasm(1), v. 0.98.38; sort(1), Unix 7th edition.
Equivalent use of .in seems much more frequent.
Gunnar
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/24
- Re: <OK> Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, M Bianchi, 2006/12/24
- [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/25
- [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/25
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/25
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/25
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation,
Gunnar Ritter <=
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Larry Kollar, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/26
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/27
- Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/27