[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Back to the future

From: Peter Schaffter
Subject: Re: [Groff] Back to the future
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:12:18 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014, address@hidden wrote:
> You're kidding! Treating AT&T requests (or the extensions -- as
> said, I don't got it) as being contaminated sanitary facilities? Isn't
> it a rating to call something salubrious or not?

I dunno.  LT wasn't averse to "porcelain" and "plumbing" for git. :)

Peter Schaffter

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]