[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

from pupa to grub or grub2

From: Yoshinori K. Okuji
Subject: from pupa to grub or grub2
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 12:35:48 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.5.3

Now this list is functional. There seems to be some trouble in the GNU 
mail server, though.

I started to replace pupa with grub or grub2. It still contains PUPA in 
many places, but I'd like to remove all PUPA names from GRUB 2, so that 
the user wouldn't be confused with the mixture of project names.

But I have one question: Which is better, GRUB 2 or GRUB? Since the code 
base is quite different, I think the distinction between GRUB and GRUB 
2 is a good thing, although I prefer GRUB to GRUB 2 as a software name.

For now, I call it sometimes GRUB 2, and sometimes just GRUB. IMO, it is 
better to have a good guideline which specifies which name should be 
used in a given situation. Do you have any idea?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]