[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2Marco Gerards (new)

From: Ruslan Nikolaev
Subject: Re: 2Marco Gerards (new)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:10:05 -0700 (PDT)

2Marco Gerards
My mistake. Please read first line as "Because it requires to load 32-bit file..."

Ruslan Nikolaev <address@hidden> wrote:
> Why can't you test for the regparam=3 bug?
Because it requires to build 32-bit file. As I said before this patch will work even the OS can't load 32-bit executables at all. I'm not sure about compiling it as a 64-bit file because it generates another code; moreover x86_64 accepts regparam=6. Perhaps it would detect bug... but who knows?
> ...
> But I am not sure if we want a 64 bits multiboot and what is involved
> with changing multiboot that way. I leave that to Okuji.
I can't understand what you mean. If it is support for ELF64 multiboot then it already presents in GRUB (see multiboot.c file).
If it is ELF64 multiboot & switching to 64-bit mode then it is MISTAKE because it requires enabling paging and it's not clear at all.
If it is 64-bit version of GRUB utilities then my patch already provides it

Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. _______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]