[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: porting to hppa-ipl

From: Jeff Bailey
Subject: Re: porting to hppa-ipl
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:02:49 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:46:37PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Sunday 30 July 2006 19:29, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > set -e;           gcc -Ihello -I./hello -I. -Iinclude -I./include -Wall -W
> > -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes                 
> > -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -g -Os -fno-builtin  -M hello/hello.c      |
> > sed 's,hello\.o[ :]*,hello_mod-hello_hello.o hello_mod-hello_hello.d : ,g'
> > > hello_mod-hello_hello.d;         [ -s hello_mod-hello_hello.d ] || rm -f
> > hello_mod-hello_hello.d In file included from include/grub/normal.h:28,
> >                  from hello/hello.c:27:
> > include/grub/script.h:27:29: error: No such file or
> > directory
> >
> > Generates a zero-byte file which is promptly deleted.  So this file is
> > never generated.
> I took a look at the log. It says that the dependency generation fails at the 
> first time, as does not exist, but it is performed again 
> after is generated. Doesn't this happen in your 
> environment?

Nope, is never generated on my system.  It looks like
on other arch's it's generated as a side effect of programs defined in
conf/*.  Because I'm still trying to get the base set of things built,
the missing dependancy causes me grief.  That's why I think it needs an
added dependancy.

Jeff Bailey

I do not agree with a word you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it. 
 - Voltaire

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]