[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TPM support status ?

From: Michael Gorven
Subject: Re: TPM support status ?
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:22:42 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.9.10

On Thursday 20 August 2009 12:15:42 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Michael Gorven<address@hidden> 
> > On Wednesday 19 August 2009 22:25:00 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> > 99% of people with this use case are not going to put their BIOS chip
> >> > in concrete. Configuring a TPM chip a lot easier.
> >>
> >> 98% of people in this case don't really care if they are secure or not.
> >
> > I said "with this use case".
> It's also what I meant. Most sysadmins just need someone to blame if
> it goes wrong.

Oh great, so all we need to provide is someone to blame! Problem solved!

PGP Key ID 1E016BE8

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]