[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Module name mangling
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: Module name mangling |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:02:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:27:03PM +0100, Martin Grabmueller wrote:
: RFC1738 specifies how URLs have to look like, and also specifies which
: characters are `unsafe' and `safe'. For the full explanation, see for
: example
:
: http://andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc1738.html
:
: In short:
:
: Safe characters are:
:
: alphanumerics and $-_.+!*'(),
Yeah right. The asterisk ^ is the character that got this discussion
started.
I also want to note that I'm not happy with the characters !, $, ', (,
and ) in filenames because of the extra hassle they cause with certain
shells in widespread use.
Lars J
--
Innovation is one percent inspiration and ninetynine percent perspiration,
and in my case; twice that... -- Norville Barnes, `The Hudsucker Proxy'
- Re: Module name mangling, (continued)
- Re: Module name mangling, Ian Grant, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Marius Vollmer, 2001/01/29
- Re: Module name mangling, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Marius Vollmer, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Michael Livshin, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling,
Lars J. Aas <=
- Re: Module name mangling, Marius Vollmer, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Neil Jerram, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/01/30
- Re: Module name mangling, Neil Jerram, 2001/01/31
- Re: Module name mangling, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/01/30