[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1

From: Keisuke Nishida
Subject: Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 00:10:02 -0500
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/21.0.96 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At 07 Feb 2001 12:44:55 +0200,
Michael Livshin wrote:
> > In the future, I guess smobs and classes should be defined in
> > association with specific modules.  That way, we can determine
> > each smob and class by a name like "guile::core::type::keyword".
> hmm.  Guile is, more or less, a Scheme implementation ;).  the
> Schemey way is to have names only for _bindings_, not objects.

Why don't you consider the above name to be a _binding_, then? :)
Looking up a smob type by name is just a binding, isn't it?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]