[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer |
Date: |
08 Jun 2001 21:46:21 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
[ following up to the list because your system bounces my mails ]
Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
> Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > should be fixed now.
>
> Thanks for your help; most things work now. However, the snarfage
> produced from the preprocessed `socket.c' contains unbalanced
> parantheses, so that the Guile reader barfs when guile-snarf-docs-texi
> tries to process the concated *.doc files.
>
> Because I can't find the way through all the snarfing, I am attaching
> the preprocessed `socket.c' to this mail.
*strange*.
can you tell me how the following command behaves on your system?
echo 'argpos ( ( ( ( ( SCM ) ( ( ( const scm_bits_t * ) ( ( SCM_CELLPTR ) ( ( (
scm_bits_t ) ( * args ) ) ) ) ) [ 0' | sed -e 's/^argpos.*[(\[].*//'
it is supposed to eat everything. it does so on my Linux system at
home and on the Solaris 2.5.1 and HP/UX systems at work. is the sed
incantation I use somehow non-portable?
many thanks,
--mike
--
The only thing better than TV with the sound off is Radio with the sound
off.
-- Dave Moon
- Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/20
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/20
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/21
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/21
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/25
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/25