[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lazy sweeping.
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: lazy sweeping. |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 03:07:29 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter, i686-pc-linux) |
Han-Wen <address@hidden> writes:
> Here are some results of my lazy sweeping implementation:
>
> [ snippo ]
>
> * Lazy sweeping sounds like a feature, but it actually leads to
> simpler, more natural code than the old sweeping code.
did you consider various finalizations? like closing file descriptors
of dead ports, sort of fing.
if you just lazy-sweep naively, some external resources may never get
freed.
--
Every program is a part of some other program and rarely fits.
-- Alan Perlis
- lazy sweeping., Han-Wen, 2002/07/28
- Re: lazy sweeping.,
Michael Livshin <=
Re: lazy sweeping., Han-Wen, 2002/07/30
Re: lazy sweeping., Tom Lord, 2002/07/29
Re: lazy sweeping., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/07/29