[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Separate textual/binary ports vs. mixed ports
From: |
Daniel Krueger |
Subject: |
Re: Separate textual/binary ports vs. mixed ports |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:31:23 +0200 |
Hey,
I think if you only use them seperate there's a clearer distinction.
If you have it mixed you can do some, say hacking, where you see it
works but you can't see anywhere what you're exactly doing, most of it
is hidden in the guile implementation, which interprets
%default-port-conversion-strategy and gives you the coding. In one
case you maybe rely on %default-port-conversion-strategy normally
being UTF-8 and then someone sets it to something else, which could
give some hard to track errors. I think explicity just makes code much
clearer and I think seperating textual and binary ports leads to more
explicity, that's my point of view..
WDYT?
- Daniel
- Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/01
- Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, David Kastrup, 2012/06/01
- Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/01
- Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Mark H Weaver, 2012/06/01
- Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/02
- Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, David Kastrup, 2012/06/02
- Re: %default-port-conversion-strategy and string ports, Daniel Krueger, 2012/06/03
- Separate textual/binary ports vs. mixed ports, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/03
- Re: Separate textual/binary ports vs. mixed ports,
Daniel Krueger <=
- Re: Separate textual/binary ports vs. mixed ports, Noah Lavine, 2012/06/05
- Re: Separate textual/binary ports vs. mixed ports, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/05
- Re: Separate textual/binary ports vs. mixed ports, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/06/05