[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- & sweet-expression
From: |
David A. Wheeler |
Subject: |
Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- & sweet-expressions |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:49:40 -0400 (EDT) |
Ludovic Courtès
> Thanks for the note. I must confess Im slightly skeptical about the
> chances of success of this approach.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
> However, Im happy youre trying,
> and the fact that you take a principled approach, with the various
> syntactic extensions defined separately seems great to me.
Thanks!
> Please let us know what youd need to have it implemented within Guile,
> or, even better, send a patch. ;-)
Okay! Since we already have it implemented on *top* of guile, I have hopes
that it'll be relatively easy to implement *in* guile.
> I think Nala Ginrut once posted a patch that would allow read to
> optionally recognize braces as delimiters. I guess thats a starting
> point?
Yes, { and } as delimiters makes the rest much easier.
--- David A. Wheeler
Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- & sweet-expressions, Marijn, 2012/08/27
Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- & sweet-expressions, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/08/28
- Re: Adding to guile curly-infix (SRFI 105), neoteric- & sweet-expressions,
David A. Wheeler <=