[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:56:46 +0200

> From: address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:45:27 +0100
> >> I don’t remember, Eli: do you have patches pending review for these
> >> issues and other MinGW issues in Guile?
> >
> > I don't know, you tell me.  I sent several changesets in June,
> > in these messages:
> OK, will follow-up on guile-devel.


> >> The non-pthread code is used when Guile is built without pthread
> >> support.  In that case, the async is queued directly from the signal
> >> handler.
> >
> > So why cannot this code be used by GDB?
> Because GDB uses whichever Guile is available.  If the user has Guile
> built with pthread support, then that’s what GDB uses.

Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built
without pthreads.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]