[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unintentional conflict in define-immutable-type?

From: Rob Browning
Subject: Re: Unintentional conflict in define-immutable-type?
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:34:31 -0600
User-agent: Notmuch/0.20.1 ( Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> The convention is indeed to use <foo> for the RTD.

...and so (just to clarify) the goops class for a record is supposed to
be <<foo>> by default, and you'd need to (define <foo> <<foo>>) yourself
afterward, if you wanted the goops class to appear more conventional?

Rob Browning
rlb and
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]