[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unintentional conflict in define-immutable-type?

From: Rob Browning
Subject: Re: Unintentional conflict in define-immutable-type?
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:33:22 -0600
User-agent: Notmuch/0.20.1 ( Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:

> I guess that wouldn't work.  After (define-immutable-type <foo> ...),
> it's important that <foo> remain bound to the RTD in the module where
> 'define-immutable-type' was evaluated.  The other procedures defined by
> 'define-immutable-type' refer to <foo> and rely on it being bound to the
> RTD.

Ahh, right.

So I suppose if you want <foo> as the goops name, then you really do
just have to choose something other than foo for the constructor within
the module.

Rob Browning
rlb and
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]