[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logo baseline
Re: Logo baseline
Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:08:52 +0100
Fun I can agree with! It is what made me stick with Guile in the first place.
GNU as an adjective seems odd: I think that can better be conveyed as a part of
the name "GNU Guile". It is and, if I have understood the discussions going on
here, will continue to be a GNU project. Maybe treat fun as a noun: GNU Guile -
fast functional fun :D
I'd leave the fine details of taglines to someone who is better versed in
english than me, though.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020, at 15:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guilers!
> The Guile logo has this “GNU extension language” baseline. As Guile 3
> came out, this baseline felt odd to me, not quite corresponding to the
> way I see Guile.
> Clearly, Guile is still an extension language, with many great
> applications (Gnucash, Lepton-EDA, OpenCog, GDB, etc.), and I’m sure
> libguile is here to stay. Yet, to me, “extension language” does not
> accurately capture what Guile today allows for and what people have been
> doing with it; since 2.0, it’s more than an extension language, even
> more so with the performance afforded by Guile 3.
> Thus, I’d propose changing the baseline. Something that would describe
> what Guile is to me is:
> GNU, fast, fun, functional
> What’s about you? What’s Guile to you? :-)
> * signature.asc
- Logo baseline, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Amirouche Boubekki, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline,
Linus Björnstam <=
- Re: Logo baseline, Matt Wette, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Nala Ginrut, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Thomas Morley, 2020/01/18