[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logo baseline
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Logo baseline |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:57:44 +0100 |
Am Sa., 18. Jan. 2020 um 15:14 Uhr schrieb Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>:
>
> Hello Guilers!
>
> The Guile logo has this “GNU extension language” baseline. As Guile 3
> came out, this baseline felt odd to me, not quite corresponding to the
> way I see Guile.
>
> Clearly, Guile is still an extension language, with many great
> applications (Gnucash, Lepton-EDA, OpenCog, GDB, etc.), and I’m sure
> libguile is here to stay.
Well, you forgot LilyPond
> Yet, to me, “extension language” does not
> accurately capture what Guile today allows for and what people have been
> doing with it; since 2.0, it’s more than an extension language, even
> more so with the performance afforded by Guile 3.
>
> Thus, I’d propose changing the baseline. Something that would describe
> what Guile is to me is:
>
> GNU, fast, fun, functional
>
> What’s about you? What’s Guile to you? :-)
>
> Ludo’.
Well, for me, Guile's _the_ extension language for my LilyPond.
It may be more, it may have become more.
And yes, I used Guile for some other stuff as well.
Nevertheless, it remains the language to extend LilyPond.
It feels very strange dropping said phrase.
Cheers,
Harm
- Logo baseline, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Amirouche Boubekki, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Linus Björnstam, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Matt Wette, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Nala Ginrut, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2020/01/18
- Re: Logo baseline,
Thomas Morley <=
Re: Logo baseline, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2020/01/19