[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: namespaces, goops, etc.
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: namespaces, goops, etc. |
Date: |
07 Nov 2000 10:48:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> writes:
> Actually, `define-class', `define-generic', and, `define-method' are
> all supposed to be top-level forms and not allowed in other contexts.
> There should be error checking in the last two as well.
but why? ordinary defines can be both top-level and internal, so why
not these?
I mean, `(define-class foo)' is just (ideally)
`(define foo (make-class))', no?
--
Due to the holiday next Monday, there will be no garbage collection.
- namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., thi, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Michael Livshin, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Michael Livshin, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Michael Livshin, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc.,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/08
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Jost Boekemeier, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., thi, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Jost Boekemeier, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Michael Livshin, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., thi, 2000/11/03