[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Install gpg2 as gpg
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Install gpg2 as gpg |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:07:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Why not just drop gpg-2.0 then?
> >
> > All three GnuPG branches (1.4, 2.0, 2.1) are actively maintained. Why
> > drop 2.0?
>
> +1
>
> Besides, I use 2.0, because for some reason 2.1 has always failed for me
> (though I never took the time to investigate.)
>
> Anyway, this patch is just about how we name the command. That the
> command is called ‘gpg2’ is a well-known annoyance, and Werner
> recommends not doing that anyway.
Is there a consensus on the way forward? Should we apply this patch to
gnupg-2.1? Is anyone willing to test and maintain patches against
gnupg-2.0 (not me)?
- Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, (continued)
Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/06/13
Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/14
- Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, Leo Famulari, 2016/06/14
- Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, Andreas Enge, 2016/06/15
- Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, Leo Famulari, 2016/06/15
- Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, Andreas Enge, 2016/06/15
- Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/16
- Re: Install gpg2 as gpg,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Install gpg2 as gpg, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/19