[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: midnight commander package fixes, opinions wanted

From: Efraim Flashner
Subject: Re: midnight commander package fixes, opinions wanted
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:55:27 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:01:23PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> On 17-03-01 16:58:41, ng0 wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'.
> > 
> > I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken
> > (as they are right now).
> > My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way
> > where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full
> > (with all the features you can have enabled)?
> > 
> > I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with
> > what we agreed on.
> > 
> And also your opinion, I don't know what an opionion is but it sounds
> like opium combined with onion and I don't want that.

I've been sitting on a patch for ranger for a while. I also couldn't
decide between packaging just ranger or also linking in the various
programs it calls.

I think that if mc would use libcaca to display an image, and just
installing libcaca in profile would satisfy that dependancy, then
leaving it out is "not great, but acceptable".

Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]