[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: midnight commander package fixes, opinions wanted

From: ng0
Subject: Re: midnight commander package fixes, opinions wanted
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:09:43 +0000

On 17-03-01 17:01:23, ng0 wrote:
> On 17-03-01 16:58:41, ng0 wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'.
> > 
> > I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken
> > (as they are right now).
> > My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way
> > where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full
> > (with all the features you can have enabled)?
> > 
> > I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with
> > what we agreed on.
> > 
> And also your opinion, I don't know what an opionion is but it sounds
> like opium combined with onion and I don't want that.

For the lack of reaction for a long time, due to whatever reasons, I
will simply propose that we go the way of vim and vim-full.

'mc-full' will have many more dependencies than our current 'mc' and
should in the end be fully functional, while 'mc' will still complain
about missing features. The description of mc-full shall reflect that
you get full functionality with this application variant.

Anyone who wants this, feel free to pick it up and fix the related bug.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]