[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any objections to removing address@hidden

From: Leo Famulari
Subject: Re: Any objections to removing address@hidden
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 17:46:44 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:47:41PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I forgot to mention:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> > I'd hate to "strand" existing users who might not notice that they are
> > not receiving updates to the 'linux-4.1' package they've specified in
> > their GuixSD configuration.
> I think they could not fail to notice, because if we removed it, any
> attempt to build a system with linux-libre-4.1 would fail immediately.

Ah, right. I was thinking of `guix package -u .` for out-of-tree packages.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]