[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any objections to removing address@hidden

From: Mark H Weaver
Subject: Re: Any objections to removing address@hidden
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:59:22 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:47:41PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> I forgot to mention:
>> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>> > I'd hate to "strand" existing users who might not notice that they are
>> > not receiving updates to the 'linux-4.1' package they've specified in
>> > their GuixSD configuration.
>> I think they could not fail to notice, because if we removed it, any
>> attempt to build a system with linux-libre-4.1 would fail immediately.
> Ah, right. I was thinking of `guix package -u .` for out-of-tree packages.

Thanks for reminding me about this issue with "guix package -u".
I just filed a bug about this:


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]