[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Starting 'core-updates'
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Starting 'core-updates' |
Date: |
Tue, 1 May 2018 10:23:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) |
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 04:12:42PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> I was running a bit late with my patches and pushed them to a separate
> branch before noticing the 'rhash' update on 'master'. Now there have
> been a couple of world-rebuilding commits on the 'core-updates-next'
> branch since, so I wonder how to move forward.
>
> * Start 'core-updates' as-is.
> * Pick all updates from the -next branch that won't rebuild the world
> (that is everything apart from "xz" and "file").
> * Take all the -next commits, remove the Perl graft, and do a new 'core'
> evaluation.
>
> Any preferences? Due to the "rhash" update, I suppose we can take
> anything from -next that depends on CMake also with option #1.
I haven't been paying attention this cycle. But if anyone has, then I
think it's best to do option 1 along with the rhash, since most of the
bug-fixing work will still be valid.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature