[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging a free Firefox
From: |
Nils Gillmann |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging a free Firefox |
Date: |
Fri, 4 May 2018 16:07:02 +0000 |
Pjotr Prins transcribed 650 bytes:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:59:24PM -0400, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> > I use IceCat personally and FF Dev Edition at work. Until the recent
> > move to WebExtensions, I used the same addons. I use NoScript and Tor
> > and have no problems. But I rarely enable JS and never run proprietary
> > JS, so my exposure may be different. I do not use LibreJS (because I
> > don't usually run JS at all in general and it historically did not play
> > well with NoScript; maybe that has changed).
>
> Disabling all extensions makes Icecat work much better. I'll try it as
> a default now.
>
> Question: why do we switch on extensions by default? Sure confused my
> experience.
>
> Pj.
I think it's because this is upstreams decision and we usually stick
with what upstream does. Although you could almost call our Icecat
a variant of Icecat due to more work going into tracking Mozilla
and applying patches done by Mark.
- Re: next browser (was: Packaging a free Firefox), (continued)
Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Chris Marusich, 2018/05/03
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Pjotr Prins, 2018/05/03
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/05/03
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Pjotr Prins, 2018/05/15
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/05/15
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/05/15
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Mark H Weaver, 2018/05/16
Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/05/15
Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/05/17
Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Mark H Weaver, 2018/05/03
Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Clément Lassieur, 2018/05/03