[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix on aarch64
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Guix on aarch64 |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:00:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I can remove one of the build machines from Berlin.
would this not aggravate the problem with the availability of substitutes?
As I understand it, then we would have two separate machines, each of
which would build the same packages; and if two machines are not enough
to keep up with the pace of development, with only one things should become
even worse. So if we move machines, maybe we should move both of them for a
little while, until the proposed changes to cuirass and the berlin storage
architecture are implemented?
Or would it make sense to instead disable automatic evaluation of the aarch64
derivations, and to only start them manually for "important" commits?
Andreas
- Re: Guix on aarch64, (continued)
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/26
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Leo Famulari, 2018/08/26
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/08/27
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/27
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/27
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/08/27
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/27
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/27
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/28
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/08/28
- Re: Guix on aarch64,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/28
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Leo Famulari, 2018/08/28
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Mark H Weaver, 2018/08/28
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Leo Famulari, 2018/08/27
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/08/27
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Joshua Branson, 2018/08/29
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/08/30
- Re: Guix on aarch64, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/08/30