[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:47:19 +0100 |
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 15:43, Julien Lepiller <address@hidden> wrote:
> So they are doing physical simulation (fluid dynamics), so they don't (can't)
> get the same result when running the same experiment twice. They wart
> replicability, that is, even if the results are different, they are close
> enough to each other that you have to draw the same scientific conclusion,
> independent of your compiler or other package inputs.
It is question for the Philosophy of Science. What is the status of error? ;-)
In the area of controlling the error, Interval Arithmetic [1] gives
interesting results.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval_arithmetic
All the best,
simon
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, (continued)
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Bengt Richter, 2019/12/06
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/12/06
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Timothy Sample, 2019/12/07
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Bengt Richter, 2019/12/07
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Timothy Sample, 2019/12/07
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Bengt Richter, 2019/12/08
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/12/09
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/12/06
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/10
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Konrad Hinsen, 2019/12/11
- Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon,
zimoun <=
Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Julien Lepiller, 2019/12/05
Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, zimoun, 2019/12/05
Re: Feedback from JRES in Dijon, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/10