[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Packaging Jami progress

From: Pierre Neidhardt
Subject: Re: Packaging Jami progress
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 17:28:11 +0100

Jan <address@hidden> writes:

> Jami developers apply many patches for different projects -
> currently our package code only patches pjproject, but ffmpeg needs
> patches for instance for auto bitrate support and I don't really know
> what has to be patched next - I listed the output of "find -name
> "*.patch"" in the first mail.
> I think copying and pasting similar code from pjproject package
> definition to ffmpeg definition isn't a good practice, that's why I
> decided to create a procedure taking patches from
> ring-project/daemon/contrib/<dependency-name> and applying them.

OK I get it now, thanks!
You are right, it's a good idea to have such a procedure then.

Pierre Neidhardt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]