[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Store channel specification in profile
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Store channel specification in profile |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:37:46 +0100 |
Hi Ludo,
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 00:48, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> Note that it was never designed to be human-friendly. :-) The Scheme
> code passed to ‘--manifest’ is friendlier.
Why do not change a bit both <profile>/manifest and code accepted by
'--manifest' to have something consistent and human friendly?
(Even if successive transactions will produce an unavoidable mess to
<profile>/manifest.)
Well, I do not see why there is 2 different syntax/semantic; one for
<profile>/manifest and another one for the code accepted by
'--manifest'.
Except, it is some pieces of work to modify the actual code. :-)
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/06
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, zimoun, 2020/01/06
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/08
- Re: Store channel specification in profile,
zimoun <=
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/13
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, zimoun, 2020/01/13
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/13
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/30
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, zimoun, 2020/01/31
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Konrad Hinsen, 2020/01/31
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/31
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/31
- Re: Store channel specification in profile, Konrad Hinsen, 2020/01/31