[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parameterized packages
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Parameterized packages |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:46:06 +0100 |
Hi!
L p R n d n <address@hidden> writes:
> (define-modificator headless
> `((xorg (modify-package xorg
> ...))
Thanks for sharing, this is an interesting approach! But it may raise a
major challenge. The point of parameters is that they must compose
(e.g. headless + static-lib), so can we do that with the "modificator"
approach?
Say for instance that 2 parameters in particular are not compatible for
a given package, how to we handle that?
This probably needs more thoughts! :)
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Parameterized packages, (continued)
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/15
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/15
- Re: Parameterized packages, ison, 2020/01/16
- Re: Parameterized packages, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/01/16
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Nicolò Balzarotti, 2020/01/16
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/19
- Re: Parameterized packages, L p R n d n, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/20
- Build systems and implicit inputs, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/21
- Re: Build systems and implicit inputs, zimoun, 2020/01/21
- Re: Build systems and implicit inputs, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/21
- Re: Build systems and implicit inputs, zimoun, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/19
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/20
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/20