[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parameterized packages
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Parameterized packages |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:51:11 +0100 |
zimoun <address@hidden> writes:
> For example, be able to rebuild all the packages with GCC-8.3, or to
> install Python packages with Python 3.5 instead of the current default
> Python 3.7.
I think this would tackle a different issue. The point of parameters is
to offer _composable_ and _package-specific_ build options to the user.
A build system cannot know what it means to build with Pulseaudio or
without Wayland.
Can't we already do what you are saying by the way? By means of
settings some build-system-specific arguments from fold-package?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/02
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/09
- Re: Parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/10
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/11
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/14
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/15
- Re: Parameterized packages,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/15
- Re: Parameterized packages, ison, 2020/01/16
- Re: Parameterized packages, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/01/16
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Nicolò Balzarotti, 2020/01/16
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/01/19
- Re: Parameterized packages, L p R n d n, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/17