[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging pjproject
From: |
Jan |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging pjproject |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Feb 2020 23:27:26 +0100 |
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:42:49 +0200
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Debian does a lot of work with unbundling software, I'd check with
> them first if they've patched anything to make it work.
>
Checked Debian and it doesn't look good.
They removed pjproject from Buster.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925263
"- pjsip is a library where a lot of functionality and behaviour is
selected at compile time using #define statements. Most of these
define statements alter the ABI due to changing structs, which makes
it ill-suited as a system wide library to be used by several programs.
- Consequently, src:ring (now called jami) has always been built
against an embedded copy and src:asterisk also switched to an
embedded copy, both tailored to their needs. There are no other
source packages depending on src:pjproject left"
I picked the worst thing to maintain, didn't I :D
I guess we can remove pjproject then and use only pjproject-jami, but
that doesn't fix the bug. I'll try checking how is pjproject-jami
different from what Jami devs build, but have no clue whatsoever.
Jan Wielkiewicz