[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reducing LLVM closure size
|
From: |
Julien Lepiller |
|
Subject: |
Re: Reducing LLVM closure size |
|
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:34:51 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Le 12 juin 2020 09:19:48 GMT-04:00, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> a
écrit :
>Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> writes:
>
>>>By the way, this looks like a bug:
>>>
>>>--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>> guix refresh -l llvm
>>>Building the following package would ensure 3 dependent packages are
>>>rebuilt: clang-toolchain@10.0.0
>>>--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>
>>>Why is only 1 package displayed?
>>
>> Because these are the dependants for llvm@10, but the default llvm is
>llvm@9:
>>
>> guix refresh -l llvm@9
>> Building the following 1180 packages would ensure 2092 lependent
>packages are rebuilt: …
>
>This does not explain why it says "3 dependent packages" but lists only
>one! :)
Because building this one will also rebuild the other two, re-read the sentence
carefully :)
llvm -> clang -> clang-toolchain