[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:42:12 +0100 |
Hi Ludo,
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 17:54, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> I think it would be beneficial longer-term to have the Emacs-Guix repo
> in the Guix group on Savannah, from the perspective of Conway’s law¹;
> it’s also probably a safe way for the project to deal with contributor
> churn. But if whoever volunteers prefers to maintain it elsewhere, so
> be it!
[...]
> ¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_law
Emacs-Guix is currently on both GitLab and Github; which provide
user-friendly (it depends on your friend ;-)) interface. One
interesting thing is: how many issue / {M,P}R reported by user that has
not contributed via email-based interface?
I could have wrong but:
- Jonas Bernoulli about transient instead of magit-popup.
- Daniel Nagy about imenu integration.
- 4 people about various issues.
The question is: in this “new” location to have Emacs-Guix on Savannah,
do the multi entry points remain? Or reduce them to only one, maybe 2?
All the best,
simon
- Announcing emacs-guix-packaging, Ryan Prior, 2020/11/10
- Re: Announcing emacs-guix-packaging, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/10
- Re: Announcing emacs-guix-packaging, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/11/12
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/14