[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:18:23 +0100 |
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> It was a conscious design choice to have tight integration via the
> Scheme APIs rather than by wrapping the command-line interface, and I
> think it’s worked well.
>
> The development features (info "(emacs-guix) Development") also
> obviously benefit from that.
Sadly it's the part that exposes one of the most obvious issues:
guix-devel-build-package-definition ("C-c . b") chokes Geiser and hangs
Emacs.
Obviously, having a REPL would be fantastic. But I don't know how to
fix these issues with Geiser, it seems pretty tough.
For the lack of a better option, building outside Geiser seems to be a
sane fix.
Cheers!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, (continued)
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/11/16
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/16
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/16
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/16
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/17
- Re: Announcing emacs-guix-packaging, zimoun, 2020/11/13