[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:20:43 +0100 |
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
>> Sadly it's the part that exposes one of the most obvious issues:
>> guix-devel-build-package-definition ("C-c . b") chokes Geiser and hangs
>> Emacs.
>
> First, please Pierre, could you stop to refer to
> `guix-devel-build-package-definition' when the correct one is
> `guix-build-package'; which needs some updates, I agree. Patch should
> come…
Misunderstanding? guix-devel-build-package-definition is an actual
command, why do you think this is incorrect? Are you talking about
something else?
Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but your last paragraph reads a bit brash.
Let's keep this a friendly conversation! :)
> Second, the issues with building packages using Emacs-Guix are about
> implementation details i.e., fix the use of the API. I am still missing
> why Geiser chokes when “guix repl” in ’M-x shell’ do not since they are
> both inherited from `comint-mode'.
It's partly explored here: https://gitlab.com/emacs-geiser/geiser/-/issues/9
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, (continued)
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/11/14
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/15
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/11/16
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/16
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/16
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, zimoun, 2020/11/16
- Re: Reviving Emacs-Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/11/17
- Re: Announcing emacs-guix-packaging, zimoun, 2020/11/13