[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patchi
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:55:43 -0400 |
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:24:40PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> I already volunteered (privately) to host the same (1 or 2 WS power-class),
> currently on ADSL uplink (so not for substitute distribution, only building),
> FTTH in the future, no UPS though.
The architecture of the build arm is such that substitutes are
distributed centrally, so you wouldn't have to worry about slow uplink,
as long as it's fast enough to pragmatically send build artifacts to the
central node.
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, (continued)
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/17
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/03/20
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/23
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/03/23
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Vincent Legoll, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Mathieu Othacehe, 2021/03/25
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/25
- Buying AArch64 hardware?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/03/30