[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patchi
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:19:21 -0400 |
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:22:16PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> I recently added a new metric in Cuirass: "Builds count per machine
> during the last day". Turns out the overdrive1 with its two workers
> seems to outperform the hydra-guix-X running emulated builds on four
> workers.
That's good to know, thanks!
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, (continued)
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/23
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/03/23
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Vincent Legoll, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Mathieu Othacehe, 2021/03/25
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching,
Leo Famulari <=
- Buying AArch64 hardware?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/03/30