[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?

From: zimoun
Subject: Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 09:32:57 +0200


On Sat, 04 Sep 2021 at 20:24, Liliana Marie Prikler <> 

> Does anyone have an idea how we should handle propagations for the sake
> of pkg-config?  Perhaps we could add "linked-inputs", which are added
> when building packages and environments when not using --ad-hoc, but
> not when union-building profiles.  WDYT?

The TODO file contains:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
** extend ‘propagated-build-inputs’ with support for multiple outputs

#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
  (outputs '("out" "include"))
    `(((("i1" ,p1 "o1")
        ("i2" ,p2))
       => "include")
      ("i3" ,p3)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---


which seems a direction the discussion currently takes.  Maybe it could
be worth to dig the history and resume this previous discussion.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]