[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Missing tags in Debbugs?

From: Bengt Richter
Subject: Re: Missing tags in Debbugs?
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:45:27 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On +2022-06-29 09:29:20 +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for the feed back
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 08:07, wrote:
> > Anyway, the idea is to make the Subject: line greppable for both
> > what the bug is about and its status when it was closed.
> I agree that it is hard to work with the Debbugs archive.  What you are
> asking seems possible with Debbugs but the GNU instance is not
> supporting many tags [1].  Using the ’Subject:’ line as tagging system
> could be a workaround but I am not convinced the ratio effort /
> usefulness is worth because it is too error-prone, IMHO.
> Arun has presented nice ideas about improving Mumi and it appears to me
> the direction to go.
> 1: <>

Thanks, that LGTM: Looks like easy-to-parse html :)

This looks interesting too, that I just found:

2: <>

Will have to try it. Maybe emacs already has a mode for that?
(I need to refresh my emacs-fu ;/ )
> Cheers,
> simon
Bengt Richter

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]