Re: GOOPS-less Shepherd

[Ivan Sokolov]

Bodertz <bodertz@gmail.com> writes:

> I don't have strong feelings either way, and the change won't really
> affect me too much, but what benefit is there in breaking things?  From
> what I understand from your message, users' configs will stop working in
> a few months when 1.0.x releases (or with the macro would "kinda work"),
> which is at least a short-term con, so what's the long-term benefit of
> this change?  Is GOOPS so bad a thing to require?

If I understand correctly, that will allow Shepherd to run on GNU Mes,
a Scheme interpreter written for Guix bootstraping.